3 ms·
So the claim is that no one group can be singled out as a cause of division? That means one would be unable to ever say that some person or group of people is d
by iammisc 5y ago
So the claim is that no one group can be singled out as a cause of division? That means one would be unable to ever say that some person or group of people is divisive, which means there's no such thing as divisive speech (since labeling anything as such is apparently itself so divisive that one becomes a hypocrit).
- jjulius 5y agoYou should not be reading my statement as an absolute; it is circumstantial/contextual.
- imtringued 5y ago>So the claim is that no one group can be singled out as a cause of division? Come on, it's probably true for a lot of things.