4 ms·
It's astounding that something like a chronological timeline free of Facebooks outrage algorithms is portrayed as censorship. And honestly the defense of Faceb
by 2pEXgD0fZ5cF 5y ago
It's astounding that something like a chronological timeline free of Facebooks outrage algorithms is portrayed as censorship.
And honestly the defense of Facebooks unethical behaviour is following a real simple pattern at this point: Shift blame to the users and make it look like Facebook critics want "more censorship".
Facebook shareholders making a few dollars less (if thats even the case) is absolutely not my problem.
- raxxorrax 5y ago> make it look like Facebook critics want "more censorship". Unfortunately a lot of them do plainly want more censorship. Worse, they want it for the whole net. Many people always advocated to be careful sharing your life with facebook. They were completely ignored. Now when the users understood they have no control about their own data and the information that gets shared, they want to make the whole net happy with content regulations with the help of the state. Facebook doesn't care much about ethics, that is true for any companies. But the users certainly had a choice here. Exception might be people in media that also has alsodependent on Facebook in the meantime.