5 ms·
Then Prospera stopped charging for the water, and the only condition they placed on completely free use of all the infrastructure that went into it was for the
by unanswered 5y ago
Then Prospera stopped charging for the water, and the only condition they placed on completely free use of all the infrastructure that went into it was for the village to acknowledge that they were receiving the water.
- zozbot234 5y agoThe article says that they temporarily stopped charging for the water due to the COVID pandemic. Subsequently, they asked that the community enter into a formal contract as a condition for supplying water. This does not seem like they acted very transparently at all, and it's unsurprising that they would now be facing heavy pushback.
- unanswered 5y agoThe article never said they started charging again, which means that "temporarily" was an editorialization. Having a written agreement—I don't think it sounded like "formal contract" to me—is more transparent than the pre-existing situation where they were informally providing water. Your complaints are internally inconsistent and it seems you just want to kvetch.