3 ms·
When I was a freelancer, I was warned by my legal help that taking a businesses site offline in response to non-payment was legally risky. There was a chance of
by vorpalhex 5y ago
When I was a freelancer, I was warned by my legal help that taking a businesses site offline in response to non-payment was legally risky. There was a chance of being sued for disrupting their business.
I wonder if there are grounds for a (reasonable) legal suit here. Anyone in the know that can fill us in?
- tazjin 5y ago> I wonder if there are grounds for a (reasonable) legal suit here. Anyone in the know that can fill us in? If this was this company's only revenue stream, chances are they can't survive until such a lawsuit has dragged out to the end.
- hollerith 5y agoThat's OK: then any settlement gets distributed to the ex-company's shareholders. (Of course some entity needs to fund the lawsuit: if the company cannot, and the lawyers will not take it on contingency, then the shareholders would need to.)
- unyttigfjelltol 5y agoYou're talking about self-help that isn't in a contract, right? The OP is talking about self-help developer account suspension that presumably is a right listed in the applicable TOS.