3 ms·

No it isn't? It's unchanged in the linked PR.

• pseudalopex 5y ago
  It was changed later.[1] [1] https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/commit/7e96640e1ca9fc74ac31e0f33d7c01692801eb66 https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/commit/7e96640e1ca...
• Dylan16807 5y ago
  "Also changed yesterday" The line about protected classes is not in addition to a general rule against harassment, or emphasizing that kind of harassment in particular, it replaced that rule. There is a separate rule against personal attacks, but is that rule supposed to take over harassment in general? That sort of makes sense in a vacuum, but then it leaves the exact meaning of the 'harassment against protected classes' rule kind of confusing. What does harassing a class mean exactly, and can you harass a non-protected class?
• jonas21 5y ago
  It was removed in a follow-up PR, "Remove abuse enabling language pt. 2", which is linked to from the first: > Encouraged by the quick success of this PR, I made #2691 with another small change. One step at a time at fixing the world :) https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/pull/2691 https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/pull/2691
  • harlekein 5y ago
    These insufferable people think they're actually fixing things with this bull shit.
    • torstenvl 5y ago
      Ah, well, but remember... intent doesn't matter...