I don't. The advantages are overwhelming, people just forgot to appreciate it that there isn't some form of central information control. We see a lot of moral

I don't. The advantages are overwhelming, people just forgot to appreciate it that there isn't some form of central information control. We see a lot of moral panics and authoritarian ambitions right now and the bad accessibility to information control is a huge blessing. If we had more responsibility here, it might look different, but that isn't really the case and probably unrealistic. For politics, clout or attention some people would love to get rid of some others people, often just because of disagreement. It is good that they cannot. We see companies firing people because they aren't a good look. Gladly that doesn't work with internet users. If I get abuse online, defense is in most cases very trivial. Given, that is a bit different for public personas. This is behavior not restricted to online content and why prominent people often have to employ PR. But that isn't a reason to worsen the net as a whole for everyone. If I only want to consume curated content, there are countless venues to do that. Sadly and curiously, people show up in places where content isn't moderated and start to complain.