4 ms·
This would also greatly help with social coherence. First make living costs so high, that they are unaffordable for the underclasses, leaving them no other choi
by 5560675260 5y ago
This would also greatly help with social coherence. First make living costs so high, that they are unaffordable for the underclasses, leaving them no other choice than complete reliance on the state payouts. Then make subsidies conditional, tiered, assigned on sufficiently complicated rules (as a side effect this would improve employment opportunities is public sector). And finally, whenever serfs would choose to misbehave, there wouldn't even be a need to intimidate - just dangle a possibility of freezing to death in winter.
- cool_dude85 5y ago>And finally, whenever serfs would choose to misbehave, there wouldn't even be a need to intimidate - just dangle a possibility of freezing to death in winter. This is reality today under capitalism. What happens to me if I don't choose to work?
- dnautics 5y agoyou have so many no-work options. You can be nice to people and live off their (informal) charity. You could probably work out an arrangement where you barter services for lodging. You could go live with relatives that work.
- cool_dude85 5y agoSame argument applies to the quote I'm responding to. Jackbooted gubmint thugs cut your power in winter? Go live with relatives that have power, or get charity, or barter things for firewood.
- marcosdumay 5y agoHum... Have you looked on the situation of ex-criminals? I really fail to imagine an unconditional transfer (like the one you are replying to) turning into a monster of untraceable rules.
- HWR_14 5y agoYou're right that making it conditional would be bad. But we can just not do that. Why wouldn't we make it unconditional? It's not like you lose your Social Security payments for having committed criminal acts.