3 ms·
And yet the Authors of this letter fail to address the most cited meta-analyses (by Dr Lawrie). She's publicly stated the removing the Elgazzar data did effect
by mgamache 5y ago
And yet the Authors of this letter fail to address the most cited meta-analyses (by Dr Lawrie). She's publicly stated the removing the Elgazzar data did effect her numbers, but not the conclusion. Also, if you read the paper she downgrades the Niaee data for several potential biases.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34145166/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34145166/
- unanswered 5y agoIn this polarized world of clickbait headlines, it's never necessary to attack your opponent's strongest argument, only their weakest. (If they don't have a weakest argument you can always publish a straw man as a false flag.) Now the totally true headlines say that ivermectin studies are discredited, and it matters not one jot that the study that was discredited was already of low credibility to begin with and was never a substantial reason for believing one way or the other.