If you talk about government intervention and funding to achieve something, you should also create reasonable checks against corruption. Especially since this a

If you talk about government intervention and funding to achieve something, you should also create reasonable checks against corruption. Especially since this article proposes hero and antagonist, this seems quite essential. A price on research result would be rife with abuse and the most wealthy and powerful corporations would suck all funds from that position in a few minutes. For something like healthcare to be established and supported, you have to create a good product that is accepted by most people. That isn't too hard for public healthcare in my opinion. It is something that will cost everyone, but might provide enough advantages. Anyone not rich or a gambler might appreciate the help in case a rare disease might induce costs no normal income could provide.