2 ms·

> telling people they're idiots I never said that. > If we ever get to an IPv6 future, there will certainly be a NAT in it. That will indeed be a very sad da

> telling people they're idiots I never said that. > If we ever get to an IPv6 future, there will certainly be a NAT in it. That will indeed be a very sad day for mankind.

georgyo 5y ago
That day has already passed: https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/ipv6/ipv6.nat6 https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/ipv6/ipv6.nat6 https://tldp.org/HOWTO/Linux+IPv6-HOWTO/ch18s04.html https://tldp.org/HOWTO/Linux+IPv6-HOWTO/ch18s04.html https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/nat/topics/topic-map/security-ipv6-nat.html#id-ipv6-nat-overview__d14963e63 https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/n... I'm used to be with you, but some things are only possible will NAT.
- tuyiown 5y ago
  > I'm used to be with you, but some things are only possible will NAT. On ipv6 besides hiding (most common setup) a randomly assigned /64 ip address behind another /64 address I really don't see what any stateful firewall can't achieve