3 ms·
The original scenario as imagined by Nozick implies the probability is much higher than 90%, something close to 1. And you can't "outsmart" the machine. This ac
by vehemenz 5y ago
The original scenario as imagined by Nozick implies the probability is much higher than 90%, something close to 1. And you can't "outsmart" the machine. This actually makes a big difference when trying to "solve" the paradox, as this author attempts to do.
Also, why you should 1 box: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzi3PCi0WBU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzi3PCi0WBU