6 ms·
I firmly believe that one of our greatest current failures as a society is the extent with which we completely accept these types of dystopic conditions - every
by ve55 5y ago
I firmly believe that one of our greatest current failures as a society is the extent with which we completely accept these types of dystopic conditions - every single action we take and word we type is surveilled, permanently stored with zero recourse, analyzed or blocked by untransparent third-party data leviathans that share few of our own interests, and often sold, shared, and completely neglected while data breaches happen en masse. Not only do we have virtually no ability to opt out of this, but these practices now begin the moment someone is born.
When I was younger I spent a lot of my time advocating for privacy, informing people of how bad the state of surveillance was, how bad it would be in the future, and what we could do to improve things. Eventually this turned out to be very bad for my mental health, because I not only realized most people didn't give a shit, but also that no matter what I did, I had no power to improve things by what felt like a even single epsilon.
With the advances we're making in hardware and machine learning, I think we are setting ourselves up for future disasters that we have barely begun to imagine - our entire society's communications and thoughts are owned by everyone except ourselves, and our ability to analyze, predict, and censor the populace with this extreme centralization of power and data is currently being scaled up even more by every tech/ad/communications corporation (and government) in the world.
I still try to do what I can, but it feels like I'm able to do less and less with each passing year; I am constantly forced to use products and services that do terrible things with the data they collect on me, yet it is increasingly becoming something outside of my control. Perhaps this makes it obvious why normal people rarely try to use privacy-preserving software and practices: they recognize how difficult and hopeless the endeavor is, and they'd rather not dedicate their lives to such an impossible feat such as communicating privately with their friends and family. The only things I can really hope for here is that we get an actual data protection law or basic consumer bill of rights in countries like the US, but I don't see this happening any time soon.
I also predict that the general populace will recognize the vast importance of this issue in the future (whether that is +5 or +30 years, I have no clue), but likely only after some very terrible events occur (it would seem the current state of advertisements, data breaches, mass surveillance, and censorship is nowhere near what it will take). This comment turned out to be more negative and hopeless than I had wanted, so I'll add that I also donated to the EFF - they seem to be pretty principled and helpful in this area, and they also sent me a cool T-shirt. I'm fortunate that I'm able to use software like Signal/IRC/Matrix with my close friends, but I wish that everyone else could be given the right of private self-expression and communiucation as well.
- api 5y agoI’m starting to think it can only be fixed with legislation. At it stands every single incentive for businesses points toward maximizing surveillance. Product design, marketing, advertising, direct monetization of data, validating business models to investors, everything is helped by more data. The push for data is relentless and the appetite is endless. Consumers largely don’t understand or don’t care. They talk shit about it but they don’t change their buying decisions.
- techbio 5y agoSo far, no legislation fix. Other alternatives?
- api 5y agoI’m pessimistic about tech fixes, not because it can’t be done but because there is zero incentive. Like I said all the money and all the incentive is toward invading privacy. Nobody is going to seriously try unless people are willing to pay for it in significant numbers. I don’t see that. Most people just don’t care or don’t understand. There is also quite a bit of surface area to defend if you are trying to make privacy guarding OSes or browsers. Look at how hard it is to eliminate browser fingerprinting. There are so many ways to infer unique information.
- roughly 5y agoI think this is made worse by our society's fundamental inability to embrace ourselves in all our humanity. My iPhone has a Kids' mode, it does not have an adult mode, and it still insists that I really meant to type "ducking" and that any app that could potentially show me a boob has no place in decent society. As long as we're unable or unwilling to acknowledge that each of us are fully rounded humans, with all the brilliance and flaws that come with that, and not just failed robots or fallen pariahs from the One True Way of Being, this kind of thing will be not just unfortunate but oppressive and dangerous.
- genewitch 5y ago