From everything I've read - which is a lot - I think the criminal case under the law is less clear than say John Kapoor & Insys (who are in jail). But it seems

From everything I've read - which is a lot - I think the criminal case under the law is less clear than say John Kapoor & Insys (who are in jail). But it seems the civil cases are much stronger, which is why this settlement is so shocking. the Sacklers have tight control and micro managed decisions it's their intention & action. But Purdue was smart enough not to make spreadsheets tracking doctor bribe ROIs ... I'm interested in why there isn't more info/investigation on the revelation in Gibney's doc that a Purdue exec sat in a motel room with the regulator in charge to write the original oxycontin label, which was then approved with very very questionable language. That potentially less addictive language was the entire lynchpin of their (minimally moral) crimes. Especially with any future revolving doors or benefits.