5 ms·
Wow. I tested it on recipes which Google has destroyed and this was the first result, a simple clear recipe: http://demont.myds.me/leerecipes/mainmeals/mainmea
by exporectomy 5y ago
Wow. I tested it on recipes which Google has destroyed and this was the first result, a simple clear recipe:
http://demont.myds.me/leerecipes/mainmeals/mainmeals1/chickengarlicveg.html http://demont.myds.me/leerecipes/mainmeals/mainmeals1/chicke...
compared to Google's endless drivel of "This chicken stir fry recipe will become a staple in your home. It’s so quick to make and you can use whatever vegetables you have on hand. It tastes wonderful regardless of how you alter the ingredients. ... " JUST SHUT UP AND GIVE ME THE RECIPE!
https://natashaskitchen.com/chicken-stir-fry-recipe/ https://natashaskitchen.com/chicken-stir-fry-recipe/
- srcreigh 5y agoFwiw this website, Natasha's kitchen, seems to be one of the more performant ad filled recipe websites. Make use of the "Jump to recipe" button to get to the recipe faster.
- 1f60c 5y agoThis isn’t entirely Google’s fault. Recipes on their own aren’t copyrighted in the US, and adding this fluff text is a way around that.
- AdamN 5y agoYes it is. They're giving a lower quality result to the user (their customer ... but not for long if competitors can get just a little bit better)
- isubkhankulov 5y agoA small nit: I think Google’s customers are actually the companies paying for ads. Its an important distinction and probably explains why their search results’ quality has gone down
- mdoms 5y agoIt is entirely Google's fault. Google knows people don't want this dreck (everyone knows it) but still serves it up.