3 ms·
It also didn't pay to be optimistic in 1968 or in 1998-1999 (perhaps peak optimism, peak irrational exuberance). 1968-1982, the S&P 500 essentially went nowher
by adventured 5y ago
It also didn't pay to be optimistic in 1968 or in 1998-1999 (perhaps peak optimism, peak irrational exuberance).
1968-1982, the S&P 500 essentially went nowhere.
1998-2012, the S&P 500 essentially went nowhere.
Those dead periods represent ~28 out of the last ~53 years.
That's a long time for the market to produce mediocre results, especially compared to expectations today.
The long-term chart and valuations of the S&P 500 are looking pretty comical at this point, in terms of irrational exuberance in the present. It's pricing in an extraordinary economic golden era of super growth, which isn't going to happen.
- onlyrealcuzzo 5y ago> 1998-2012 This is basically the same as saying 2005-2020. Just because there was a temporary crash for one year, does not mean 1998-2012 was a bad time for investment. The US Government was well into its asset subsidization spree by then. 1999 tech stocks were not a good investment. Other than that, this was a pretty good time to invest.