3 ms·
you're deferring thinking to an unnamed mystery expert and then arguing on behalf of that unnamed mystery expert as if you know what they'd say. lol, just lol.
by deft 5y ago
you're deferring thinking to an unnamed mystery expert and then arguing on behalf of that unnamed mystery expert as if you know what they'd say. lol, just lol.
- dekhn 5y agoas part of the international scientist cabal, of course I know who the expert is
- markdown 5y agoWatch it! We're not supposed to talk about our group.
- grepfru_it 5y agoThe cdc link provided raw numbers. The telegraph link is a journalist deducing a conclusion. I don’t think any experts provided any conclusive evidence in this thread (which I gather was the point of the comment you replied to)
- bluGill 5y agoAnyone can claim to be an expert. Once one comes forward we can evaluate to see if their claims hold up. In this case experts have pointed out that the analysis is wrong because it doesn't compare mycardius in the control group even through we know covid also causes that. Nor do they consider harm, despite vaccine caused mycardious being mild.