3 ms·
Good point! As it is said above, it's all just pure theory. But, let's imagine what would happen: If somehow a "junior" member of your team seems to produce hi
by sdevonoes 5y ago
Good point! As it is said above, it's all just pure theory. But, let's imagine what would happen:
If somehow a "junior" member of your team seems to produce high-quality code (for "junior" standards) that require zero help from other team members, and always on time, then I guess the team would be fine with the "junior" participating minimally in meeting calls (perhaps even with the camera off... now here I'm assuming 100% remote, something I didn't explicitly said before).
- warrenm 5y ago>If somehow a "junior" member of your team seems to produce high-quality code (for "junior" standards) that require zero help from other team members, and always on time, then I guess the team would be fine with the "junior" participating minimally in meeting calls (perhaps even with the camera off... now here I'm assuming 100% remote, something I didn't explicitly said before). Not gonna happen First, they're gonna wonder how you're "magically" doing so well - and then either want to push you out, or move you up to a "senior" role Second, you have to participate in team calls - regardless of your relative seniority, "participating minimally" is going to get you canned
- european321 5y agoYou underestimate how a sleep people are at the wheel or just busy with their own stuff, at least in smaller companies, just no time to think "Let's push this junior out, he is doing too well". Not attending meetings could still cause some questions though.