7 ms·
he did: "[suggest] that it was the judge's age that caused him to make an error" he didnt: "[use] the judge's age in support of the first argument" forgive me
by catshirt 15y ago
he did: "[suggest] that it was the judge's age that caused him to make an error"
he didnt: "[use] the judge's age in support of the first argument"
forgive me; perhaps you could clarify the difference?
- Dylan16807 15y agoIt was a side note and not part of the argument.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- jcc80 15y agoIs this a first year philosophy class? Reminds me of kids in law school. Ad hom this, straw man that...pointless discussion. We can all go look up the definitions if we want & decide for ourselves. Let it go & discussion the actual issue. Fact is having a second means to communicate (a .me or whatever address) doesn't mean speech isn't an issue here. http://www.thedomains.com/2011/08/05/federal-court-rules-domain-seizures-do-not-violate-free-speech-loss-of-domain-is-not-a-substantial-hardship/ http://www.thedomains.com/2011/08/05/federal-court-rules-dom...
- starwed 15y agoIt is the difference between > My opponent is an idiot and believes X to be true, therefore X is false. (ad hominem) and > X is false. My opponent believes X to be true, therefore they are an idiot. (Not ad hominem.)