3 ms·
> "Under all models, Apple would be entitled to a commission or licensing fee, even if IAP was optional." (page 67) It seems you still can’t make it 30% cheape
by makeitdouble 5y ago
> "Under all models, Apple would be entitled to a commission or licensing fee, even if IAP was optional." (page 67)
It seems you still can’t make it 30% cheaper. Sure, making a different offer and skirting around the rules might be possible, but the judgment gives Apple the right to go after what it feels is cheating.
- Aeolun 5y agoSomeone using their general purpose browser to make a purchase on a general purpose website is hardly cheating though. Especially if you can use your v-bucks outside of iOS.
- makeitdouble 5y agoThere's so many clauses in Apple's contract that make no sense outside of allowing Apple to make more money, that the very definition of "cheating" is way off what should be expected. I mean, preventing devs from linking to their own sites to create an account to their own existing, pre-app service was forbidden. Common sense has long gone down the drain.