5 ms·
Maybe if she talked to her coworkers about their interests instead of tasking creepy photos without their consent, she'd realize that it's actually a shotgun, n
by Rebelgecko 5y ago
Maybe if she talked to her coworkers about their interests instead of tasking creepy photos without their consent, she'd realize that it's actually a shotgun, not a rifle.
The implication in the replies that no one from Texas has a valid opinion certainly says a lot about her communication style though.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- threshold 5y agoOh it’s a shotgun, not a rifle. Yes that makes all the difference. But taking a photo of an employee’s screen and posting it on the internet is way over the line.
- Rebelgecko 5y agoThe comment about it being a shotgun was a bit tongue and cheek, but my point was that it seems like she's more interested in demonizing people who are different than trying to actually understand them. You see that when she refuses to consider the opinion of someone who was born in a certain place. You also see that when she implies that her coworker is breaking company policy and creating a safety issue- if that was actually the case why would you wait 6 years, when no one can prove or disprove the accusation? It seems like she wasn't actually concerned about the safety issue, she was more concerned about collecting a critical mass of "receipts" before she publicly disclosed her alleged victimhood.
- dekhn 5y agoIIUC some shotguns can fire rifle bullets and vice versa. The more I look into gun ontology the more I realize it's a massive latent space and most people talking about guns have no idea how smooth the continuum between assault weapons, rifles, and shotguns are.