3 ms·
It's kind of amusing to see them attempting to use Web 3 / 3.0. Web 3.0 was supposed to be the semantic Web, more than a decade ago [1] (an attempt which genera
by adventured 5y ago
It's kind of amusing to see them attempting to use Web 3 / 3.0. Web 3.0 was supposed to be the semantic Web, more than a decade ago [1] (an attempt which generally failed to be realized, and was silly vague regardless). I suppose enough time passed that someone decided the term could be repurposed since the last attempt to match the term to a new technology inflection point didn't come to much.
[1] https://www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/co/2009/01/mco2009010111/13rRUxE04on https://www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/co/2009/01/mco2009010...