3 ms·
An estimated $68.8 billion over 20 years approximately, between state and federal authorities. The Institute for Justice has published a couple of their Policin
by adventured 5y ago
An estimated $68.8 billion over 20 years approximately, between state and federal authorities. The Institute for Justice has published a couple of their Policing for Profit profiles (that attempts to keep track of and update on civil asset forfeiture figures and progress/regression), with the most recent in 2020.
California is averaging $25m per year the past 17 years; Illinois is averaging $33m per year; Texas is averaging $18m per year; Florida is averaging $49m per year. Some of the best states are Idaho, Montana, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Maine, New Hampshire, Virginia, Colorado, West Virginia, Iowa, Wyoming, Hawaii, Oregon, Connecticut and Missouri.
Here's an infographic by the Institute for Justice for 2018, sizing the states by their civil asset forfeiture thefts (note, the color of the box doesn't coordinate to the scale of theft, that coordinates to state law grades):
https://i.imgur.com/sqg4FiC.jpg https://i.imgur.com/sqg4FiC.jpg
It's too bad these scumbags aren't targeting Michael Dell ($50b), Jim Walton ($65b) or MacKenzie Scott ($61b) with civil asset forfeiture. Sorry MacKenzie, that Amazon stock no longer belongs to you, it has been 'impounded' by the Washington State Police. It's being held as, uhm, evidence that you may have had a role in the operation of a massive counterfeit goods ring. Congress or the Supreme Court might finally get around to stopping the practice (or maybe they'd just place a ceiling on how much you can steal from one person).
- stevespang 5y ago. . ."you may have had a role in the operation of a massive counterfeit goods ring" - - - only that the wealthy folks you mentioned have access to any dozens of high profile lawyers which would cost them less than 1/100th of 1% of their assets. This is all about targeting the middle and poor class - - - whom in too many cases cannot afford to hire decent attorneys just to try to get back what was stolen from them, especially if the legal cost it is equal to or less than the amount stolen. So called "Justice for All" was never "EQUAL Justice for All" - - even though it's a hideous mockery that "Equal Justice for All" is on the side of the US Supreme Court Building.