5 ms·
You might be being downvoted because: Even if you are right (that they might just implement the easy ones), you don't actually lose anything by adding the clau
by latch 15y ago
You might be being downvoted because:
Even if you are right (that they might just implement the easy ones), you don't actually lose anything by adding the clause. At worse case, you're as bad off as if you didn't have it. Not exactly a "counter-argument" since you don't actually lose anything.
As for why not just pick something else...It's hard to tell without the full list...how do you test that something can hold 600lbs? Even if there is something relatively easy, say, that sockets are X feet apart from each other...again, what's the harm in 1 additional quick check? (and if you say their reputation, I'd argue it might have helped their reputation as oppose to harm it)
- cookiecaper 15y agoYou waste the time and resources of the venue and cause some lackey to hate his job.
- JoachimSchipper 15y agoSaid lackey just got paid to eat a whole bunch of brown M&Ms.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- DavidAdams 15y agoNot to mention the fact that once you've acknowledged that you've read the contract, likely you'd be able to strike the M&M provision.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- phxrsng 15y agoHaving worked at venues I can tell you that the person that did this job was likely "local crew" and someone who was probably thrilled to be doing ANYTHING for the band, MM's related or not.
- jackowayed 15y ago(S)he also may well have eaten all of the brown ones, making it much more enjoyable.
- jules 15y agoAlso, the other checks, like sockets support X amperes, are much more likely to be satisfied accidentally even though they didn't read the contract carefully.
- joezydeco 15y agoUntil a breaker blows in the middle of a show. Oops.