3 ms·
Some of the examples here strike me as wrong. For example: being forced between a $100 trip and a $50 trip, both of which are prepaid, if both can't be done be
by anovikov 5y ago
Some of the examples here strike me as wrong.
For example: being forced between a $100 trip and a $50 trip, both of which are prepaid, if both can't be done because they are on same day. It's not a fallacy at all to choose the $100 one - even if we are not sure in which way exactly, we are still living in a free market so if the cost was 2x without any beneficial differences, it wouldn't sustain itself - so that trip is likely to be better in some way.
Not dropping out of a paid program with a lower success rate in favour of a free one with a higher success rate is a good thing: it very likely means that a free one is a cheap, bs thing that gives no real knowledge (certainly they won't teach you better for free, so if the pass rate is higher it only means that exams are simpler to please everyone). Plus, some time is already lost on the paid program, and time is money.
- HarHarVeryFunny 5y agoThe ski trip one does seem bogus. The person obviously wanted to go on both trips since they bought tickets for both. Unless something has changed and they no longer want to go on the $100 trip in the future, then it makes sense to go on that one now to reduce future costs (spend $100 in future vs spend $50 on other trip in future). Whether they enjoy the $50 trip more than the $100 one, or think they may do, is irrelevant if they still want to experience both (as one can assume by their having bought tickets for both).