4 ms·
It should be mentioned that their reasons were mainly developer convenience/productivity, and not “correctness”. I think people severely overrate the value of
by judofyr 5y ago
It should be mentioned that their reasons were mainly developer convenience/productivity, and not “correctness”.
I think people severely overrate the value of the language when it comes to avoiding bugs. We already know how to minimize bugs: Extensive testing regimes (automated, manual, or both) and a general focus on correctness over “shipping on an artificial deadline”.
- nradov 5y agoIronically, advocates of dynamic typing often claim that it improves developer convenience and productivity.
- karmakaze 5y agoYou can have something that aids convenience/productivity and not correctness. You can also have something that aids correctness that increases developer convenience/productivity. I treat static typing as the latter. Edit: Btw, the github.com/sorbet/sorbet project is really well run and surprisingly easy to get into. I've been drafting PRs. C++ is not nearly as rough as I remember from decades ago.