This is the same reductionist nonsense Chomsky engages in. What "real reason" is there for anything to "exist" and what do those terms mean? There's no real re

This is the same reductionist nonsense Chomsky engages in. What "real reason" is there for anything to "exist" and what do those terms mean? There's no real reason for corn in a can to exist, you have corn on the cob! It's a subsidy whenever any product was developed based on parts of a project the people in a state created, because the state was paying them. Well, then I guess I exist because of state subsidies. The state reimburses and sets standards for medical procedures and I had open heart surgery at 2. Hell, is Steve Jobs' Apple the result of state subsidy because he formed a company that's state sponsored, when he should have struck out on his own to be a fingerpaint artist from his own materials and talent? These arguments feel like ridiculously cherry picked characterizations that have no weight and contribute nothing.