6 ms·
memoryholing episodes == ?
by bostonsre 5y ago
memoryholing episodes == ?
- ceejayoz 5y agoSpotify didn't bring over the old episodes with people like Alex Jones, Gavin McInnes, and Milo Yiannopoulos. > “There were a few episodes they didn’t want on their platform,” Rogan said, per DMN. “And I was like, ‘OK, I don’t care.'” https://www.thewrap.com/spotify-deletes-joe-rogan-podcast-episodes/ https://www.thewrap.com/spotify-deletes-joe-rogan-podcast-ep...
- duxup 5y agoKinda curious, do fans .. .care about that? I guess some do but I don't think I ever listen to past podcasts that I've already listened to...
- ceejayoz 5y ago> Kinda curious, do fans .. .care about that? Beyond bad faith concern trolling, I suspect not.
- nradov 5y agoI'm not particularly a "fan", but I do enjoy listening to some JRE episodes when he has interesting guests like Andrew Huberman. I don't care about losing access to old podcasts any more than I care about Netflix pulling certain movies. That's just the reality of all streaming services. Content gets removed all the time for all sorts of reasons. If you want to maintain access to something then you'll have to make a local copy on hardware you own.
- conductr 5y agoIt leads to that content never being produced. It’s a form of censorship.
- bostonsre 5y agoAll of the old ones are on youtube anyways, so I would guess not. e.g. an alex jones one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdVso9FSkmE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdVso9FSkmE
- dylan604 5y agoIf you're recommending someone should listen to a previous episode you might be interested that it is avaialable or not.
- pelasaco 5y agoI for example like to hear everything from the beginning of the pandemics.. it is quite interesting to see now how wrong/right the experts were.
- literallyaduck 5y agoThey don't burn books, they just remove them. Those episodes happened, and removing them is a form of gaslighting. If they find the content objectionable then putting a disclaimer, if it is objectionable enough then removing the entire series from the platform could be an option, but it is lost history. In this case the artist doesn't care, and probably is happy to sweep those episodes under the rug. It is like how Disney wishes they hadn't made "Song of the South".
- duxup 5y agoAren't they still available on YouTube / elsewhere?
- effingwewt 5y agoThe problem, as with every memory-holed episode ever, is that people watching/listening for the first time (or say they only use X platform to consume whatever) will never know they existed. In other words, lying by omission is still lying. Edit to add- just to show how unbelievably petty the reasoning can be- Tyler Perry threw a bitch-fit about an episode of Boondocks and had it pulled (as was an episode ripping on BET when they screamed). For something that was pure satire and a cartoon they not only had it pulled from airing, they now no longer list the episodes at all on Hulu/HBOMax, pretending they never existed at all, even re-numbering the episodes. All because of Tyler Perry/Some BET exec's ego? GTFO. We have Holocaust deniers while still having people alive that survived it. We have people constantly denying proven, recent history and some people think it's ok to censor shit and pretend it never happened and it'll be all roses and sunshine.
- duxup 5y agoThat seems strange though. YouTube isn't a library where I expect them to host anything uploaded forever under any circumstances.
- effingwewt 5y agoThat isn't what we are speaking about here. If youtube buys the rights to a show and uploads 'their version' of it with episodes missing and re-numbered so no one will notice any are missing, they are controlling a narrative. They should at least have a disclaimer about the missing episodes. This isn't some new idea here.
- kristjank 5y agoShame. Not to condone these people, but since getting along with everyone was Joe Rogan's thing, I think they should've embraced it. But Joe was most likely not glad to preserve that part of his career either, otherwise I assume he would protest.
- kbenson 5y ago$100 million is a lot of incentive to not protest. The line between actually important and kinda important gets really well defined when you throw that much money on the table.
- chaoticmass 5y agoRemoving certain old episodes from the catalogue (as if they never existed, so they become forgotten)
- correct_horse 5y agoMemory hole is from 1984. It is where they put papers to be incinerated and forgotten. Spotify removed a few Joe Rogan episodes IIRC.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- TakerofVita 5y agoI'm guessing this: > A memory hole is any mechanism for the deliberate alteration or disappearance of inconvenient or embarrassing documents, photographs, transcripts or other records, such as from a website or other archive, particularly as part of an attempt to give the impression that something never happened. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_hole https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_hole
- blendergeek 5y agoI believe GP is refering to the fact that Spotify has removed episodes from Joe Rogan's back catalog that have been deemed controversial [0]. [0] https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-rogan-experience-podcast-episodes-removed-spotify-2021-4 https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-rogan-experience-podcast...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]