4 ms·
I’m still unconvinced about Intels big core little core architecture. Sounds great for a laptop, but I don’t want that in my desktop. In games waiting tens of m
by jbluepolarbear 5y ago
I’m still unconvinced about Intels big core little core architecture. Sounds great for a laptop, but I don’t want that in my desktop. In games waiting tens of milliseconds is a long time.
- sroussey 5y agoFor a desktop (or a laptop plugged in) you could just use little cores for sleep mode.
- protomyth 5y agoOr let the little cores run OS processes that are always running so they don't interrupt your game.
- Dylan16807 5y agomicro seconds. It can advise on shifting cores around as fast as the OS is ready to, so the delay doesn't have to be worse than a normal sleep. If you have a normal "active game" timer frequency, then Windows is probably checking in every millisecond, and it will have extremely accurate data to use. And that's even without any special mechanisms to react faster.