4 ms·
I can understand the desire to shake off the burden of compatability with PGP - but maybe not if sticking to the same design, and just shifting encryption primi
by e12e 5y ago
I can understand the desire to shake off the burden of compatability with PGP - but maybe not if sticking to the same design, and just shifting encryption primitives somewhat?
If you want PGP - there's the sequoia project to consider as well:
https://sequoia-pgp.org/ https://sequoia-pgp.org/
The "stateless cli tool"[1] looks like it's mostly complete for sign/encrypt etc now?:
https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-sop https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-sop
sqop generate-key julia@example.org > julia.secret.pgp
sqop extract-cert < julia.secret.pgp > julia.public.pgp
echo "a message" | sqop encrypt julia.public.pgp > message.pgpo
sqop decrypt julia.secret.pgp < message.pgp
a message
[1] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dkg-openpgp-stateless-cli-02.html https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dkg-openpgp-stateless-...
Apparently expired? Was sop abandoned?