3 ms·
If you don't want shared ownership for properties in your area - then advocate for the local government to buy out all of the properties... but that would be s
by JAlexoid 5y ago
If you don't want shared ownership for properties in your area - then advocate for the local government to buy out all of the properties... but that would be shared ownership of all properties.
Imposing restrictions on forms of ownership is in itself a form of forced shared ownership.(If someone is going to tell me that I cannot sell my house to whoever I choose to, then I do not outright own my house)
- tw04 5y agoSo if I don’t want a chemical plant built on the property behind my house, I should advocate for the government to buy all the land rather than have zoning laws? That’s ridiculous. Nobody is telling you who you can sell your house to, they’re telling the person buying the house what they can do with it. That already exists basically everywhere.
- JAlexoid 5y agoYes, you should. And preferably, you should advocate on buying out that land and decide what to do with it. Otherwise you're free to sue the chemical plant for any chemical smells and damages. So if I want to sell my house to an LLC - I'm not allowed. Therefore your claim is factually false. Making my ownership just non-existent.