4 ms·
I'm going to say something a lot of people don't like, but here it goes. Don't work harder than your desired title suggests. In fact, be slightly less producti
by ravenstine 5y ago
I'm going to say something a lot of people don't like, but here it goes.
Don't work harder than your desired title suggests. In fact, be slightly less productive than your peers with the same title without sacrificing quality.
Always go home on time and don't do any kind of overtime unless it's an emergency.
Make occasional appearances at group lunches and social events, just enough to seem like part of the team but not be too well liked or notable.
Be friendly, but don't buddy up with management.
Always be looking for different positions elsewhere or other companies you would want to reach out to in case you need to abandon ship.
Have fuck-you money saved up.
If you contribute code on GitHub, be anonymous about it.
Consider contract work so you can choose the kind of work you want to do (and create a business and hire yourself under your chosen title/role in case you need to go back to a W2 job).
Be vague, slow to respond, and not overly enthusiastic when management makes you do "reflections" and "self-assessments" that ask you where you want to advance in your career or "where you see yourself in 5 years".
When management walks by your desk, act relaxed and don't look like you are stressed or working very hard; even if your work is poor, management likes the perception of an employee that "works hard" for them.
Don't do things to make them think of you in particular if a peer higher in the hierarchy leaves. If there is an emergency, let seniors handle most of it unless you are the only one available to help.
Only participate in meetings when necessary and don't talk for the sake of talking.
Care about the users/customers of the service you are building, but don't care about the company itself more than you need to or emotionally invest yourself; every company is capable of firing you at the drop of a hat and they will not keep in touch unless they absolutely need to and are willing to drop the advancement bullshit to make you happy.
If a promotion is offered to you, thoroughly inquire about the responsibilities for the position, make note of the new responsibilities that you really don't like in particular and speak to your manager about making some exceptions because you "have strengths in some areas but weaker in these others"; use corporate buzz words during your one-on-one to talk about the promotion.
Again, always have your eye out for other roles and keep an exit strategy in your back pocket.
Working hard isn't a virtue in and of itself, and growth to no end isn't sustainable. There is nothing wrong with finding your place and performing adequately within it. I believe that my generation (Millennials) and later have been especially indoctrinated into the fantasy of the "dream job", the need to always be hustling and advancing, and working for paternalistic companies that "care" about the growth of their employees. It creates lots of shame for those who don't have the will to do what it takes to land the corner office. Most of our grandparents made their living doing things that weren't particularly prestigious and didn't live with that constant lack of satisfaction or sense of shame that they won't live up to their parents success. If you are contributing something to society in whatever amount and you are living the life you want to live, nobody really has the authority to tell you that you shouldn't be satisfied with that.
- Aeolun 5y agoWell, yes. But I think it’s boring as hell. Just like video games have many layers, jockeying for promotion is another layer to the game of work. Since I’m essentially forced to play it all day long I may as well check out all the features.
- Kranar 5y agoYou just spouted the most popular response and opinion posted to HN. For an actual unpopular opinion, if you want to stagnate and work applying the same repetitive skillset over and over again, work for a company where stagnation is not only fine but more than welcome. Those include government jobs, non-profit organizations, and very large companies that have little to no risk of competition, such as telecom, large banks, or various zombie tech companies that have not managed to produce any significant innovations in more than 2-3 decades... like IBM or Oracle. Most other companies in the tech field simply do not have room for stagnation and a company that has stagnating workers will find itself highly vulnerable to disruption by a company that prefers to hire people who have a genuine interest in constantly keeping their skills up to date. It also causes major productivity issues for a company that has stagnating employees because it inhibits the ability of experts from distributing their knowledge. The majority of the value from senior most experts does not come from their direct output but rather from the distribution of their knowledge and expertise to people less skilled. All of that potential gets lost if there's a substantial group of people who simply want to stay put in their skillset.
- throwawayboise 5y agoI have such a stagnatory job right now, in a large state university. Odd as it may sound, I currently do not report to anyone. Nobody is tasking me with anything, nobody is supervising me. I therefore have about 5 hours of real work to do in an average week. The rest of the time I can use to learn about and explore things that interest me, so personally I am not stagnating.
- UK-Al05 5y agoKeeping technical skills updated and innovation are rarely the skills that move you up the hierarchy