4 ms·
Science hobbyist website since 1994
- fallous 5y agoIt's always a joy when I randomly feel the need to check and see if amasci is still up and running and am greeted with the comforting display of good old mid-90s HTML text and links offering all manner of interesting content. What a dichotomy to the current "all pages must be apps/infinite scroll and optimized for ads" design that has reigned for the last decade or two.
- wbeaty 5y agohttps? We don' need no stinkin' https. We are from BEFORE GEOCITIES! Usenet Newsgroups forevah. See amasci.com 1995 timeline: http://amasci.com/news.html#older http://amasci.com/news.html#older Also, see much recent activity on: https://www.quora.com/profile/William-Beaty?sort=views https://www.quora.com/profile/William-Beaty?sort=views
- fallous 5y agoI tip my hat to you sir, for providing 25 years of the pleasure of pursing the scientific method and experimentation, even in areas that would be often dismissed by Those Who Know Things(tm). If a claim is made, well then roll out the experiments and demonstrate it works or it's false. In the 90s I actually thought you were responsible for the Scientific American Amateur Scientist column but after a year or so of regularly browsing your site I realized you were simply what Amateur Scientist SHOULD have been in the 90s, reflecting the zeitgeist of the prior decades of SciAm AmSci. I spent plenty of time kicking it on usenet circa 1990 and later, but as a content creator you have to bust out your gopher links for proper cred. ;)
- Causality1 5y agoI love the 90s aesthetic but that "toil girl" link is twelve kinds of "wtf".
- mastazi 5y agoI was curious so I checked it out. It's the website of an artist who makes pin-up style portraits. Some of the images might be considered mildly NSFW if you are in a very conservative environment. It seems the author promotes the concept of body acceptance/positivity. Not sure why the site would deserve the "WTF" reaction. https://www.toilgirls.com/ https://www.toilgirls.com/
- userbinator 5y ago"anesthetic" is a great malapropism, although more suited to the "modern" sites that try to make your brain numb with little content and much whitespace... "Slightly NSFW and not PC" is definitely a trait of 90s personal (and even some professional) sites, and personally I prefer that in comparison to the sterile, boring, excessively-inoffensive stuff today.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- pope_meat 5y agoThis is a cognitive hazard.
- sitkack 5y agoI went to one of the monthly meetings in the 90s. It was a hoot. The overton window had blown open and was flapping in the vacuum of space.
- wbeaty 5y agoMonthly meetings, Tesla-worshippers only. Also some UFO abductees and orgone-believers. Also Boeing engineers and radio hams. http://amasci.com/freenrg/oldmeet.html http://amasci.com/freenrg/oldmeet.html
- genericone 5y agoFor a second I thought this post referred to sciplus (1), another science hobbyist website since forever ago. 1. science surplus: sciplus.com
- rhklein 5y agoWhen learning electronics as a hobbyist, amasci had some really nice non-textbpook explanations of voltage, current and transistors. Really made you think deeply about the subject. Here is an example about transistors. http://amasci.com/amateur/transis.html http://amasci.com/amateur/transis.html
- spiritplumber 5y agoOne of the first websites I ever could get to. I was in high school at the time, and feeling pretty alienated. This kept me sane and gave me a hobby that then turned into my career. I'm grateful. Check out the guy's youtube channel, too, cool mechanical levitation stuff.
- dang 5y agoSome past threads: Scratch Holograms FAQ (1996) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26887689 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26887689 - April 2021 (10 comments) Why is electricity so hard to understand? (1989) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26362492 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26362492 - March 2021 (145 comments) What is Electricity? (1996) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23442181 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23442181 - June 2020 (46 comments) Why Three Prongs? (1996) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20378852 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20378852 - July 2019 (232 comments) “Invisible Electrostatic Wall” at 3M adhesive tape plant (1996) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16299441 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16299441 - Feb 2018 (104 comments) Why is electricity so hard to understand? (1989) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12894192 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12894192 - Nov 2016 (202 comments) Drawing Holograms by Hand (2003) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12250657 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12250657 - Aug 2016 (18 comments) Why is electricity so hard to understand? (1995) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10558622 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10558622 - Nov 2015 (6 comments) How transistors really work (1995) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10558206 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10558206 - Nov 2015 (22 comments) Holography without Lasers: Hand Drawn Holograms (1995) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9052375 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9052375 - Feb 2015 (17 comments) "Invisible Electrostatic Wall" at 3M adhesive tape plant (1996) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5387052 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5387052 - March 2013 (23 comments) Why three prongs? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4058834 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4058834 - June 2012 (146 comments) "Invisible Electrostatic Wall" at 3M adhesive tape plant (1996) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3274335 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3274335 - Nov 2011 (46 comments) Science Misconceptions in Textbooks and Popular culture - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1771101 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1771101 - Oct 2010 (23 comments) Holography without lasers: hand-drawn holograms - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1464625 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1464625 - June 2010 (9 comments) How transistor really works, an alternate viewpoint - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1462524 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1462524 - June 2010 (14 comments) Right angle circuitry - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1460631 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1460631 - June 2010 (10 comments) How electricity doesn't work - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1237484 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1237484 - April 2010 (21 comments) Fingernails on Blackboard - Possible Explanation - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=623504 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=623504 - May 2009 (8 comments)
- anthk 5y agoOne of the few webs which renders lovely in Links.
- c2xlZXB5Cg 5y agoRefreshing
- marshray 5y agoThe "Electricity" misconception pages are golden http://amasci.com/miscon/elect.html http://amasci.com/miscon/elect.html
- wwarner 5y agoI have to plug this similar laser science FAQ, maintained by Sam Goldwasser http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/lasersam.htm http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/lasersam.htm .
- ssivark 5y agoGreat vibe! To add to the mix: As a teen when I first started frequenting the interwebz, one of my favorite sites was personal website with a lot of great science content, with a very hand-crafted vibe (which continues to this day!): https://fourmilab.ch/ https://fourmilab.ch/ Little did I know that it is the personal website maintained by John Walker, the founder of Autodesk! It continues to be a pleasure to browse, say, on a lazy Sunday afternoon.