3 ms·
This gets two things wrong, namely that the US has some sort interest to regulate cryptocurrencies to protect its7the USD‘s power, and that it lacks the means t
by IAmEveryone 5y ago
This gets two things wrong, namely that the US has some sort interest to regulate cryptocurrencies to protect its7the USD‘s power, and that it lacks the means to do so if it wanted.
As such, it’s par for the course for the cryptocurrency discourse which, from the early days of Bitcoin, liked to think of itself as valiant underdogs fighting the USD. Lurking behind that thinking are various conspiracy myths of who, exactly, is using that currency‘s power for what. If in doubt, just let them talk for five minutes, and see if they mention the FEE being “a private bank”.
One would have thought people notice when reality doesn’t conform to their expectations. The world’s governments never tried to stop Bitcoin, but instead, for the longest time, either ignored it or reacted with mild bemusement. Only when people started to expose themselves to fraud risks en masse did they reluctantly try to curb the worst excesses.
You know, like governments not beholden to shadowy cabals would do.
- imtringued 5y agoThe underdog thing never made any sense. Bitcoin is just another USD clone but with some stupid rules about money issuance that makes the USD's construction flaws appear pathetically small. USD and Bitcoin are "slow money" or "scarce money" depending on what you want to call them. The velocity of money keeps going down or the supply doesn't go up to counteract the slow down in velocity, which is something that is incompatible with a real economy. It's especially incompatible with positive interest rates. So what happens is that people stop working. The only difference with Bitcoin and USD is how the money is created. With USD banks grant credit (bank money). With BTC miners literally just print money out of thin air and pay themselves, but note, there is a BTC economy and 99% of it consists of printing money ahem mining. Bitcoin itself proves that creating money isn't necessarily a bad thing. However, what it gets wrong is that the flaws aren't about how money is created, it's what is done with the money after it is created. People hoard USD on bank accounts or as cash with a guaranteed risk free 0% return even when the real economy has declined. So now the dollar is competing with the real economy for capital. People abandon the real world in favor financial games. Does that sound familiar? It's the exact same thing with Bitcoin. Bitcoin's value goes up faster than the real economy can catch up, so people will accumulate Bitcoin to get those "above real economy" returns, while abandoning the real economy. Really, the biggest difference is that the USD is legal tender. In practice people wouldn't accept such extortion from the remaining holders of USD and issue their own "fast money" with a constant velocity of money built into it. That money isn't Bitcoin. There are hundreds of regional currencies around the world.