3 ms·
I’ve been using them for the past 30 years and have come to a different conclusion. You have plenty of languages that do what you want. I hope go doesn’t lose w
by jshen 5y ago
I’ve been using them for the past 30 years and have come to a different conclusion. You have plenty of languages that do what you want. I hope go doesn’t lose what made it different
- leshow 5y agoOh sorry, you were saying lack of generics were the reason you could make sense of code easily, implying that if a language has generics you can't make sense of it. That seems juxtaposed to having used them for decades. In any case I can tell you're passionate about this so I think we can just agree to disagree. That said I don't think there's much "hope", from the looks of things it is coming to Go.
- jshen 5y agoI'm hoping that Go still keeps it's relative simplicity. It's lack of inheritance gives me hope that generics won't be as complicate as it is in other languages. I understand generics well, I just find code bases that use a lot of abstractions harder to read than Go.
- takeda 5y agoYou know? Original Java was a fairly simple language :) Generics were added in 2004 in J2SE 5.0.