4 ms·
I can't even write a simple comment about health tech without going on for multiple paragraphs. Truly, it is a wicked problem. Have said this before, but healt
by motohagiography 5y ago
I can't even write a simple comment about health tech without going on for multiple paragraphs. Truly, it is a wicked problem.
Have said this before, but healthcare is the Afghanistan of tech where giant empires go in thinking they can solve it and leave beaten years later wondering what happened. We're still about 5 years before a viable tech gets traction that could be useful in that space, and interestingly imo, one of the YC 2021 batch is the most well positioned to do it because they are doing authorization as a service (warrant.dev), which could meet the basic delegation need which is the pattern the whole health world is predicated on. We do collaboration pretty well with tech and we're just starting to make headway on identity and access control, but we haven't figured out workflow delegation and designation in any meaningful and open federated way, which is the necessary condition of the basic physician/nurse, physician/specialist, physician/hygenist, physician/orderly etc. workflow pattern.
What people don't get about healthcare is that it is not a vertical or a sector, it is a parallel planned economy of autonomous entities, not unlike higher education but more distributed. I have done a lot of consulting work in a very large single payer system over the years, and the reocurring pattern is that even government thinks it's an enterprise, or a collection of enterprises. It's really an archipeligo of federated diverse organizations that orbit doctors and other health care providers. When you think, "oh, I've got a document management system or search for health!" you don't unless it is document management or search for a hyper-federation (like a hypergraph). You don't build products for this, you build tools, and the "healthiness" of a given tech is about how it supports this complex and dynamic relationship pattern.
If I were google developing technologies for health, I'd be solving the basic hyperfederation problems. I hate to say it, but from a technology perspesctive, it's very likely a blockchain problem, where the health ontology (HL7,FHIR, etc) gets distributed via the consensus, and individual records would be graphs over its elements. Unfortunately, HL7 suffers from the same architecture complexity problem, where complex standards and rules yield stupid behavior in the field. This is to say the problem is health information techs all fail for the same reason, which is the basic problem of imposing central or top down design models on a stubbornly bottom up economy full of non-technologists.
- SamuelAdams 5y agoGood points in here. If you want to read a good book that discusses all the different players in healthcare, i recommend “An American Sickness” by Elisabeth Rosenthal. It does a great job pointing out the various players and the conflicting interests between them. Highly recommend for anyone looking to learn more.
- AlbertCory 5y ago> "healthcare is the Afghanistan of tech where giant empires go in thinking they can solve it and leave beaten years later wondering what happened." Great metaphor. It's kinda like Education: if you come in thinking you're going to make money, all the existing players say "Hello, sailor!" I joined Google in 2005. Even then, executives who were out of favor were sent to the "health care division" which was commonly understood as the one-way door out of Google.
- malwarebytess 5y agoIt's a shame that these games have to be played.
- bsder 5y ago> It's kinda like Education: if you come in thinking you're going to make money Your statement can stop there. There isn't some huge amount of money sloshing around in education when contrasted to healthcare. In education, you're fighting over pennies. If you want money in education, you have to target the "tutoring" level which is boutique and caters to those with extra money.
- AlbertCory 5y agoRight. I knew a researcher at a well-known company who was developing software for kids. His attempts at getting outside funding were usually met with "This is great, I'd love to have this for my kids! But funding it? Let me get back to you on that."
- duffpkg 5y agoThis is a very salient comment. I wrote "Hacking Healthcare" and created ClearHealth/HealthCloud. If you are in any way looking for opportunities I'd love to chat with you. du@50km.com