4 ms·
Surely there is one person in the world: that would be the anecdote to the data. We can't disregard something if there is one conflicting data point, unless we'
by pnt12 5y ago
Surely there is one person in the world: that would be the anecdote to the data. We can't disregard something if there is one conflicting data point, unless we're talking about maths or proofs.
With that being said: if someone is feeling bad because they think they're an impostor, first they should:
1. Reflect if they really are
2. If yes, improve
3. If can't improve, either embrace it or quit
- baobabKoodaa 5y ago> Surely there is one person in the world: that would be the anecdote to the data. We can't disregard something if there is one conflicting data point, unless we're talking about maths or proofs. The claim here was "no single counter-datapoint can possibly exist", so in this case, one counter-datapoint is indeed sufficient to prove the claim false.