3 ms·

This is a disingenuous argument not written in good faith. You know very well that the contract writers did not intend for this to happen, and yet you are pret

This is a disingenuous argument not written in good faith. You know very well that the contract writers did not intend for this to happen, and yet you are pretending otherwise just to make a provocative argument.

thewarrior 5y ago
Who decides what was intended in a decentralized system where code is law ?
- baq 5y ago
  side question: what does decentralized have to do with the issue?
  - 8note 5y ago
    No common jurisdiction to go to an actual court to get it sorted
    - baq 5y ago
      i mean, if code is law, a centralized system will have the exact same issue.
spywaregorilla 5y ago
If you go bowling, and remove the gutter rails, you have to accept that you can now throw a gutter ball.
- baobabKoodaa 5y ago
  Yes, but if you try to aim for the bowling pins, and you miss, don't make a disingenuous claim that you intended to miss in the first place.
bart_spoon 5y ago
I don't think its disingenuous. The entire purpose of a contract is because neither party can trust the other to go along with what each other "intends" and therefore has to be written out explicitly in a legally binding document. I think its an important point to be made.