5 ms·
Of course, many problems have fairly obvious physical solutions you ignore all costs of said "solutions". Containing a pandemic is also not rocket science. Just
by em500 5y ago
Of course, many problems have fairly obvious physical solutions you ignore all costs of said "solutions". Containing a pandemic is also not rocket science. Just have everybody stay at home simulataneously for 2 or 3 months.
- Frost1x 5y agoIt's not even that simple: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-species_transmission https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-species_transmission With pathogens that jump between species, as SARS-CoV-2 has with several populations, including white-tailed deer[1] in the US, you potentially need to isolate all reservoir species from each other as well. [1]https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02110-8 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02110-8
- hnlmorg 5y agoCross species transmission is rare and while some cases have been reported, they're really the exception rather than the norm. If there was really that big of a risk where we'd need mammals to isolate as well, then veterinarian services the world over would have collapsed under the weight of house pets contracting the virus. edit: curious about the downvotes. Perhaps you have proof that has eluded the virologists researching SARS-CoV-2. Please do speak up ;)
- Vecr 5y agoWhy would they get severe disease when they get infected? Even most humans don't, let alone other species with different receptor setups. The virus is absolutely in non-human animal populations almost everywhere, and is not a candidate for eradication.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- nradov 5y agoIt's not possible to have everyone in the whole world stay home for 2 months. That was never an option.
- tomp 5y ago> Just have everybody stay at home simulataneously for 2 or 3 months. You probably wrote this half-jokingly, but actually… this is exactly what Australia tried last year and … well it’s still trying.