5 ms·
Something I'd missed before: "By design, this feature only applies to photos that the user chooses to upload to iCloud Photos" This is not about what people ha
by AndrewDucker 5y ago
Something I'd missed before:
"By design, this feature only applies to photos that the user chooses to upload to iCloud Photos"
This is not about what people have on their own phones. This is about what people are uploading to iCloud, because Apple does not want CSAM on their servers!
- Hamuko 5y agoIf Apple didn't want CSAM on their servers, they'd implement it server-side on a worldwide basis, and not on the client-side for US clients.
- tpush 5y agoThey explicitly don't want to implement it server-side due to the privacy concerns of decrypting every image in iCloud Photos. Doing it on-device limits Apple's possession of decrypted photos to those likely to be CSAM.
- DavideNL 5y agoApple obviously does not want CSAM on their servers. As the document states, they do not want to scan all images server-side for privacy reasons. They just want to flag the positives while keeping privacy standards as high as posible for everyone else.
- dspillett 5y agoImplementing it server-side would require the content to be on their servers to scan, doing it client-side reduces that risk (or, as they claim, don't want to do that for privacy reasons, or most likely a mix of both those two reasons).
- amelius 5y agoThey should have thought about that before going in the cloud business. I mean, the amount of nastiness you'll find online is beyond belief. Just ask any person at FB who is tasked with reviewing posts.
- fingerlocks 5y ago> Something I'd missed before If you go back and read the earlier mega-threads, there were many people pointing this out and downvoted to oblivion. Hysteria is a helluva drug. For anyone concerned about the hypothetical framing attack via WhatsApp auto-saving, you can selectively control which apps have access to your photo library (and thus iCloud) in settings.
- falcolas 5y agoThis is met with disbelief because of one simple fact: There is nothing that limits Apple from scanning other files, other than “we pinkie swear we won’t.” Corporations have a terrible record about breaking non-revenue-impacting pinkie swears. Breaking this one - especially when “what about the children” is involved - would have no meaningful impact on their revenue or share price, it could even go up.