3 ms·
What? I was responding to someone who said "lead poisoning also has symptoms such as depression and fatigue, which could marginally sway people towards inactio
by pmoriarty 5y ago
What?
I was responding to someone who said "lead poisoning also has symptoms such as depression and fatigue, which could marginally sway people towards inaction."
What I just quoted is an argument against lead being implicated in an increase in crime. I was just pointing out why lead might be implicated in crime after all, despite the above quoted argument against it.
So what exactly am I doing wrong here?
- Dylan16807 5y agoBecause they already know there are lots of arguments for lead to cause an increase. The part you quoted was them reaching on purpose to come up with an argument that could even possibly go the other way. They already know it's likely wrong. You pointing out it could be wrong isn't needed. They already know there are lots of anti-lead arguments, so you making another one isn't needed.