3 ms·
So, OP provided a high-quality source, and you're ignoring it without reading it, because you know it's wrong? Without reading it. Is that right?
by timr 5y ago
So, OP provided a high-quality source, and you're ignoring it without reading it, because you know it's wrong? Without reading it. Is that right?
- ajross 5y agoYes, that's exactly right. It can only be true if there were 400M US covid infections. There are only 330M americans. I'll put my basic math skills up against any "high quality source" with a claim this ridiculous. The IFR is just plain not 0.15%. Period. That value is simply wrong. Or the paper might be from very early in the pandemic (and... wrong). Or most likely the comment above has simply misinterpreted it, deliberately or not. An IFR of 0.15% for covid is laughably ridiculous.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- timr 5y agoStop arguing. Read the paper. The parent did not misinterpret it. It is not from early in the pandemic. You are wrong.