3 ms·
Then patent offices will generate adversarial AI review examiners. Together the AI trolls and AI examiners might for the first time produce true innovation out
by unyttigfjelltol 5y ago
Then patent offices will generate adversarial AI review examiners. Together the AI trolls and AI examiners might for the first time produce true innovation out of the patent-giving process
- dleslie 5y agoAFAICT, a sufficient AI review examiner would validate all inputs that are reasonably coherent, but not necessarily novel.
- dasudasu 5y agoMore likely to be the opposite. It would be very easy to explore prior art through tons of databases. On the other hand, AI has been touted for years to be on the verge of revolutionizing case law and this has yet to happen.
- annoyingnoob 5y agoIn my experience with patents, you don't really need something novel as much as you need unique words in your patent, its all about wordsmithing.
- BrianOnHN 5y agoAfter said trolls force the hand of the government to invest in a sufficient adversarial network.
- Archelaos 5y agoYou forgot to mention the AI judges, when there is a dispute.
- mrosett 5y agoIsn't that just the objective function?
- wallaBBB 5y agoConsidering the quality of current examinations in the approval process, I don't see how AI can do any worse. Basically now instead of doing a proper technical analysis and search over already approved patents, seems they just approve and "let the courts handle it". I understand a proper type of technical patent analysis in the approval process is extremely hard and resource consuming, but the way it's handled now is killing anyone not having a legal firm on their speed dial and cash to burn.
- sudeepj 5y ago> patent offices will generate adversarial AI review examiners What if someone patents these examiners first? :)