4 ms·
Arguments employed by the anti-lockdown crowd (of which Rand Paul is one) are increasingly resembling the "climate skeptics" crowd - it doesn't matter whether t
by yongjik 5y ago
Arguments employed by the anti-lockdown crowd (of which Rand Paul is one) are increasingly resembling the "climate skeptics" crowd - it doesn't matter whether their various positions are consistent with each other. It only matters that each one of them, taken individually, undermines the "mainstream" narrative. Hence, coronavirus is nothing to worry about, lockdowns are unnecessary, vaccines are unnecessary, and at the same time the CDC is responsible for millions of deaths.
- readflaggedcomm 5y agoWhere does Dr. Paul's argument that the US funded that lab, and the lab's work was not allowed to be funded, go wrong?
- orwin 5y agoSo you're saying that the US founded a lab in china to engineer a deadlier coronavirus?
- totesraunch 5y agoDoctor of ophthalmology doesn't mean anything to me unless we're talking about eyes. Additionally, he's accredited by a board he himself created. That's like printing your own credentials. On the topic at hand, some people on the US actually believe covid was created specifically to undermine Donald trump, despite the fact that this is a world problem. Talk about myopic.