3 ms·
> "we could never know if they were telling the truth" Depends on your epistemology, but I'd like to believe that most people could. At some point you have to
by no-dr-onboard 5y ago
> "we could never know if they were telling the truth"
Depends on your epistemology, but I'd like to believe that most people could.
At some point you have to draw a line between an unsatisfiable skepticism and believing third party, independent observer. In my example an electric company suffered an outage due to an attack. Certainly linemen, switch operators, NERC-CIP-familiar personnel and other people would be able to testify to the press (or to others) that something strange did happen. Having worked on outages related to that kind of stuff, I myself could testify that when people in my field see strange things on public-sector systems it somehow makes it's way around the community ;). The point here is that it would/will lend credence to the claims that those scary men in black suits make.
But of course, believe what you want. That's always going to be your prerogative.
- pmoriarty 5y agoOk, we could know about some large-scale events where there were lots of witnesses that something happened, maybe even mostly what happened, but I don't see how we could know who was ultimately responsible or why. Secret agencies can pin blame on anyone or any country they like, and there's ultimately no way to tell.. especially when double agents, false flag operations, and provocateurs are taken in to account. The intelligence field is the proverbial hall of mirrors, and that a spy agency said something or was in any way involved is my cue to give up any hope of ever figuring out what was really going on.