3 ms·
> Not one sentence beginning this way in this context will ever be anything other than a sexist generalization. > That was the point being made It was not, as
by Supermancho 5y ago
> Not one sentence beginning this way in this context will ever be anything other than a sexist generalization.
> That was the point being made
It was not, as you accidentally recognize:
"I'm sorry you had to work with unprofessional assholes that won't take 'no' for an answer"
which recognizes that the sentiment/point does not apply to all men.
You are making a subjective interpretation, so I stand by the fact that you are being disingenuous and your interpretation is wrong on that basis, until specifically addressed.
- Karunamon 5y agoI think it's plain at this point that you are not approaching this in good faith. The original statement was an 'all' statement, as are statements like 'women do..' or 'men do..' or 'black people do..' and 'white people do..'. The comment about 'unprofessional assholes that won't take no for an answer' was a discussion of specific bad conduct, i.e. the behavior the original comment actually had a problem with, as opposed to the entire identity they originally called out. If you don't believe me, fine, but I think I explained what my actual point was very well.
- Supermancho 5y ago> I think it's plain at this point that you are not approaching this in good faith I'm not being critical of the point by picking a narrow interpretation (they meant to be critical of all men), despite acknowledging the limits of the point in the same post. Therefore, I'll disagree with the quoted assertion, as well. Good luck with whatever.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]