2 ms·
>would subsidize the electric vehicle sector to the tune of $174 billion The U.S. infrastructure deal was unanimously supported by all members of the house, no
by minsc__and__boo 5y ago
>would subsidize the electric vehicle sector to the tune of $174 billion
The U.S. infrastructure deal was unanimously supported by all members of the house, not just the speaker.
This type of uncertainty/doubt argument can go both ways. Her spouse lost money on that specific option call, so that could also be proof she didn't use her influence.
- fennecfoxen 5y ago> The U.S. infrastructure deal was unanimously supported No it wasn't. By all members with a (D) after the name who she leads, perhaps, and some others, but not all. > that could also be proof she didn't use her influence I don't find this a compelling enough argument that it would likely restore the public's lost trust in these institutions.
- minsc__and__boo 5y ago>I don't find this a compelling enough argument that it would likely restore the public's lost trust in these institutions. Which is precisely the point of how illogical it is.