2 ms·
Regardless of the actual costs, it's still a waste of energy to keep something hovering in the air when it can be moved over land as well: keeping something flo
by tremon 5y ago
Regardless of the actual costs, it's still a waste of energy to keep something hovering in the air when it can be moved over land as well: keeping something floating in the air will always require active power, whereas keeping it on the ground can be done passively (a spring/suspension system).
If we're serious about surviving the next 100 years, frivolous energy expenditure is not the way to go.
- Aeolun 5y agoBy the time we harness 100% of our energy from the sun there will be little reason not to use it. It’ll just be wasted otherwise.