3 ms·
Please continue. Explain how those beliefs intersect with moral value.
by splitstud 5y ago
Please continue. Explain how those beliefs intersect with moral value.
- thereisnospork 5y agoPlease explain how 'pro-life' isn't a moral position. Isn't the position fairly summarized as: 'it is immoral to abort a pregnancy under <insert circumstances here>? Emphasis mine.
- the_optimist 5y agoWhere exactly do you propose this intersects with the concepts of “stupidity” and “superstition”?
- Dylan16807 5y agoThe hell is this question? You're the one who equated stupidity and superstition with "moral value"!
- the_optimist 5y agoPray tell, which group of people do you think are stupid? Please also subsequently elaborate on how your judgment is objective, and detached from an appraisal that might be interpreted as mere goodness and badness.
- Dylan16807 5y agoI didn't have any particular groups in mind here, because those weren't my comments. And even if I pick a group, it's irrelevant to your "where do you propose this intersects" question because the intersection of those two phrases in this comment thread was set up by you. You tell me where they intersect, if the intent was something more complex than treating them as synonyms.
- ipaddr 5y agoIt's easy to see how pro abortion can be a decision based on money. So it might be considered a practical decision. The opposite position could be practical in certain societies. A Mexican parent would encourage having the baby. In other areas with more traditional values it might be more practical. Whatever position you have could be moral or practical or cyclical or spiritual.