3 ms·
> may cause harm Literally anything can be argued to be "harmful."
by cronix 5y ago
> may cause harm
Literally anything can be argued to be "harmful."
- rzzzt 5y agoAs an example, some people consider GOTO statements to be harmful.
- brink 5y agoOr more precisely; some people don't. /s
- takeda 5y agoActually that's a good analogy. If there weren't people that blindly accepting it as the truth and verified everything this wouldn't be bad, in fact would be good because it could drive attention to something that perhaps was ignored. Unfortunately large part of population has no idea how to do fact checking, and what's worse many take their news from the Facebook.
- sharikone 5y agoI imagine YouTube removing C tutorials because they "encourage harmful behaviors"
- tylersmith 5y agoMaybe that's why their challenge failed.
- dane-pgp 5y agoWell at least the government isn't mandating that all "harmful" content be taken off the web... https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/dec/15/online-harms-bill-firms-may-face-multibillion-pound-fines-for-content https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/dec/15/online-ha... (For what it's worth, the proposed law now refers to "safety" rather than "harms").
- 31758329051230 5y ago>Germany >UK