> Your claim that the media is simply not reporting that vaccinated people are much better protected to the point of it basically not being a threat is not “a f

> Your claim that the media is simply not reporting that vaccinated people are much better protected to the point of it basically not being a threat is not “a fact”. > That being said, considering how small a percentage of people are vaccinated, it’s still a massive threat we cannot simply ignore. OK, so your issue is that I've critiqued the media for sensationalism. You think the media is not being sensational, because There Is a Major Threat. That's fine. We can disagree. The facts are still the facts, and people can interpret threats in light of those facts. You've now triple-responded to my comment with essentially the same thing. Maybe you're seeing this through an emotional lens? (FWIW, I haven't seen any major news outlet report that the latest data for secondary transmission of "the Delta variant" indicates that it is not more contagious in the UK. That's a pretty big change, and it's new information. Even if you can find a single news source that has reported it, it's not widely known.) > We need to double down on vaccination even more I'm not sure what "double down" means, but I never said that people should not get vaccinated.